As an older rider I once thaught riding a trials 4 stroke is a nice idea, cool sound, no premix, smoother engine, .... in the mid 80's there was also a let's call it a small 4-stroke rush, so I've got an Italjet Scott plonker back then and was disappointed, because of the weight and the engine that was far behind the 2-stroke in torque, power output, ...
I went back to a 2-stroke after some months, getting a Montesa Cota 304 and where pleased again.
As all know a couple of years ago nearly all manufactors have developed 4-stroke bikes, (intresting point is that gasgas has aborted their 4-stroke project, if they will do a restart ...?), but as also mentioned already the development of the 2-stroke engine went on too.
After the new OSSA now has developed a working fuel injection system for a 2-stroke trials I think there is no substancial benefit anymore using a 4-stroke engine.
The electric driven bikes do have some issues with the batteries now. Maybe in the future we will see cheaper, better and lighter units that don't cost as much as now. As long as these rechargeable batteries make up between 60 - 40% of the complete bike and only have a limited duration I will not hop up this train.
Best thing for a consumer like me is to wait if there will be another break throw in technical development, I once took part in the development by buying a nice looking and cool sounding piece where the development wasn't finished I will not do that again. It is just too expensive.
I will follow any further invention that will be made in the engine comparement and if it will turn out it is a benefit I will opt for it.
Meanwhile:
I'am pleased with the 2-stroke, again!
I will not go for a 4 - stroke because there is no benefit.
There is no serial electric trialsbike for adults, so this is not an option for me yet.
Thank you so much for the information and photos. Im new to this Bultaco forum,so if you have any more photos or any relevant info on the 221, as i beleive this is quite a rare model. Your bike is a credit to you, looks fantastic! Any info will be greatly appreciated as i have little knowledge on this model. Kind regards darrel
Hi Darrel,
if You need photos and or other information/copy of documents, you can PN me a list or write it down here in your threat. I will then look around at home, if I may can help you.
The standard pressed steel bracket will break if the bike is ridden in any sort of reasonable competition, if it is not repaired the frame will begin to bend, the backbone bends upwards and the front downtube bends inwards and hairline cracks will start in the downtube at the bottom engine mount and at the junction of the top triangular gusset and the downtube. All the 199B bikes I have seen have had the pressed steel bracket, so I would really like to see a detailed photo of the late factory alloy one fitted with the tank off. When I have seen photos of some english bikes with them fitted I just assumed they were a comerfords modification.
Cheers Greg
Yep, totally right, to avoid any overstraining to the headstay it is necessary to mount the complete cylinderhead / headstay assambly together.
Bending the headstay down for getting the engine better out of the frame is a bad idea, (you will overstress the steelplate, which later will cause that it cracks). Just unscrew only the two fastenings of the cylinderhead for getting loose the headstay is also not recommended, you can "wrap" the head.
This is the problem of this kind of bracket.
BTW:
Why the headstay is not mounted to Mr. Michauds former Bultaco is a miracle to me.
I haven't written / said that it is impossible that someone changed the design or the headstay.
But as I know there is no offical parts book and no offical photo around showing this bracket.
Nevertheless the aluminium bracket is an improvement, because you don't have to bend the steel one down or loose one
head nut + one head screw to get the headstay detached for more space to get f. ex. the engine removed.
Juast as a reminder: the bikes build after the bancrupty of Bultaco where somekind special because the executive board wasn't involved in the production.
BTW:
Some Bultaco riders don't even mount the headstay, (Here the T199B EX Fred Michaud):
I have read your post, there was NO other headstay mounted than the one made out of steel.
Maybe someone installed an other unit to Yours or one of the last reminding workers, - still employed in line with the welfare program that was initiated by the goverment-, that wrenched the last Bultocosbikes together from the remaining parts that where available in the factory was tired of searching and mounted what he found.
If you have any doubts, ask Orlando Colander, he is one of the last remaining importer of bultaco
motorcycles und parts and he is still in business too! -> www.orlandocalondersa.com
Otherewise show me the part number ... there is none I know
Don't know where or in which events you ride but "I Think" the flat slide carb is illegal in AHRMA events.
Alan
I think you will find they are using the PHBL dellorto as the flatslide is illegal for their competition. I have a PHBL on my 325 and it runs fantastic, 36 pilot and 116 main. My dellorto is a gasgas genuine spare part so you can run a gasgas throttle cable and throttle.Hope this helps.
Cheers Greg
Both of You are right, the VHST carb would be illegal by using with the Bultaco in a AHMRA events. I just looked up the rules here in Europe, (Germany), here it's the same. So this carb would work but it's not allowed to mount him, OK.
Actually I got my eyes to this model by a page of Todotrial where this model is shown exactly for classic bikes as I understood.
BTW: My understanding of Spanish is very very poor, here is the text:
"También los famosos Dell'Orto están ya disponibles en TT Shop. Ideales para restauraciones y preparaciones de clásicas, ya que hay modelos que se utilizaban en la época, como el PHBH 28 o el PHBL 25, con lo que superan las verificaciones técnicas de las competiciones de trial para clásicas. También está disponible el novedoso VHST 28 mm de compuerta plana, que mejora el rendimiento de los clásicos de compuerta redonda."
But maybe my enthusiasm has made me blind for the real facts.
Another option would be to get a manufacturing company to take a lot of points on a cordinate measuring machine and then have an Engineering college make a CAD model (there is a shell type tool in the CAD systems to make the model bigger to allow for shrinkage). They can then print a sand castable 3D model. Take to a sand casting company and make the casting. You still would have to have it machined. I'll take a look at my new 199B when it pick it up. Below is a pretty cool do it youself prototyping method. Might be more appropriate for like side panels or headlight plastic. Also we use some urathanes that have a much higher yeild strength than these materials (just keep your feet on the pegs and you wont have any problems!).
Sounds nice and great too, after my casting sidecases in aluminium medly.
I bought a pair of used sidecases the other original one's that are damaged i have now sended to a special company that will repair them, (very expensive).
But if You get replicas out of plastic and they work, (don't forget the kicker, the clutch and the gearing locations on both sides). I am surly one of the first that will buy a pair of you. Just send me an PM when got any good results.
What Is The Future - 4 Stroke Or 2 Stroke?
in Four-Stroke
Posted
Just to throw my 2 Pence or Cent opinion in here:
As an older rider I once thaught riding a trials 4 stroke is a nice idea, cool sound, no premix, smoother engine, .... in the mid 80's there was also a let's call it a small 4-stroke rush, so I've got an Italjet Scott plonker back then and was disappointed, because of the weight and the engine that was far behind the 2-stroke in torque, power output, ...
I went back to a 2-stroke after some months, getting a Montesa Cota 304 and where pleased again.
As all know a couple of years ago nearly all manufactors have developed 4-stroke bikes, (intresting point is that gasgas has aborted their 4-stroke project, if they will do a restart ...?), but as also mentioned already the development of the 2-stroke engine went on too.
After the new OSSA now has developed a working fuel injection system for a 2-stroke trials I think there is no substancial benefit anymore using a 4-stroke engine.
The electric driven bikes do have some issues with the batteries now. Maybe in the future we will see cheaper, better and lighter units that don't cost as much as now. As long as these rechargeable batteries make up between 60 - 40% of the complete bike and only have a limited duration I will not hop up this train.
Best thing for a consumer like me is to wait if there will be another break throw in technical development, I once took part in the development by buying a nice looking and cool sounding piece where the development wasn't finished I will not do that again. It is just too expensive.
I will follow any further invention that will be made in the engine comparement and if it will turn out it is a benefit I will opt for it.
Meanwhile:
I'am pleased with the 2-stroke, again!
I will not go for a 4 - stroke because there is no benefit.
There is no serial electric trialsbike for adults, so this is not an option for me yet.