
jimsshed
Members-
Posts
23 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://www.JimsShed.com
-
ICQ
0
Contact Information
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users. |
-
We've had the experience of both Beta and Gas Gas (and Montesa 4RT) in our family. In terms of maintenance, I actually found the Rev-3 slightly easier to work on eg; carburettor removal and replacement. In terms of build quality, I consider them even. You can pick flaws in both. In terms of riding...that's up to you. go to a club day and ask someone for a ride on their bike. They're both good trials bikes. If you want the best build quality and ease of ownership then buy a 4RT. People just don't appreciate how different the 4RT is in this area until they actually own one.
-
I tried a similar concept on my son's Beta Rev-50. They're awfully tinny and loud (bad Beta Motor Co.). I got a roll of 50mm exhaust header-wrap and tightly wrapped it around the expansion chamber from where the header pipe is welded onto the expansion chamber, right back to just behing the chamber's mounting bold. I secured it at each end using strong zip ties. The noise reduction was enormous and he could comfortably ride around the back yard, and the header wrap was surprisingly durable. It never fell off or became loose at all. Even the pressure cleaner didn't budge it. FYI: Exhaust header wrap is a soft woven fibreglass fabric ribbon used on drag cars etc to shield parts in engine bays from high radiated exhaust temperatures. You buy it from performance auto stores. Jim
-
I think you mean you have a Beta 50 Mini-trial, not a Rev-50 (which has a clutch and manual gearbox). There is no air screw, and you will find that this carb, with it's plastic slide and single jet (yep, there's no pilot jet either) is a cheaper item than you'll find on most lawn mowers and something Beta should be ashamed of.
-
A shrieking clutch would indicate something is wrong with it. I've never heard a 4RT clutch do this. The on/off clutch on my 06 4RT was cured by a tip given to me by Tarp, our Australian importer. It was simply to back off the actuating pin's adjusting screw at the lever as far as possible. This has the effect of changing the leverage dynamics as you pull in the clutch. I was astounded at the difference. My clutch is now nicely progressive whereas before it was very on/off. There is still plenty of room to disengage with one finger without crushing my other fingers between the handgrip and lever. It did not affect the ability to start in gear. Tarp says if I want even more adjustment, to remove (grind off) 1 to 2 mm from the actuating pin. I haven't needed to do this cos' I like it as it is. I also slid the clutch lever assembly further in along the bar so that when I reach out with two fingers, they touch just inside the knob on the lever's end. This of course increases the arc length, and reduces required effort. Jim
-
I went through a few plugs initially, but since then I always let the bike sit and idle from start for at least one minute. Let it idle, don't blip or rev it when stone cold. My last plug lasted about 10 months. I live in Brisbane Australia, so those of you living in colder climates should extend this warm up time. Jim
-
Sorry, who are Birketts? Do they have a web site? Thanks, Jim
-
I read somewhere once that someone manufactures an 80cc kit for the Rev50. Does anybody know if this really exists and who sells it ? Cheers, Jim
-
My son has a 2006 TXT50 Boy. I've made all the mods as suggested by Tonyp884 and am glad to say it performed beautifully at our last trial. Max 2 kicks to start it, and we now kick it with much much less effort. In summary I did Following... * Cut away airbox baffle and also drilled holes in airbox lid * Dropped needle another notch. Clip is now in the topmost position. * Air screw is backed out 2.5 turns * Fitted iridium plug Engine now idles better. Responds smoothly low to mid range. Very noticeable increase in grunt and overall power. We rode the entire trial and didn't have to replace the spark plug. Even when he dropped the bike the engine was less prone to cutting out, and when it did, it still only took one or two kicks. Woo hoo !!!! Thanks Tony. Jim
-
Ned, I'm glad you liked it and I hope you buy one. You've made a valid point about the suspension. Given that, I'd really like to ride another one sometime with a standard setup. You are right in your assessment of low vibration. Compared to the 2T bikes I've ridden, it is as you say 'super smooth'. My comment was based on getting on/off each bike and riding exactly the same terrain and I felt, the 4RT was even smoother. I don't have a brand loyalty. Witness my family's current garage; a Beta, a Gas Gas, and a 4RT. Each bike bought by me because I felt it was the best bike at the time for the intended rider. Last 2 years I rode a Beta, this year a 4RT, and I have no qualms about buying a Scorpa in the future if I feel then, they have a bike I like best. So far, based on my ride of the 2006 250f, the 4RT is easily the bike I like best, and I'm glad I didn't wait for the 250f, even though I too admired the pre-release photos. One thing I am biased towards these days is the 4T motor because it is so clean and smooth, although I hear at least one brand is developing an EFI 2T, so you never say never. Cheers, Jim
-
I had a test ride on an SY250F last Sunday on a demonstrator bike supplied by our local dealer (6-Aug-2006). I own an 06 4RT but feel I can be objective if I don't write too much. My comparison was very direct as I was able to get on/off either bike and ride exactly the same terrain or section. It was very easy to start. As easy to kick as a my 4RT. Maybe a touch easier (believe it or not). Much lower geared than 4RT, 2nd gear was like 4RT's 1st gear. As such, I felt 1st was wasted. Would be ok for lower grade riders I suppose, but others will rarely use it. Compared to 4RT, response was much softer down low, although I suspect that was due a lot to the very low gearing. Certainly didn't punch like the 4RT does with a standard map. Some people might like that. Tractability in slow going was very good. Clutch lacked feel somewhat. Slow turning was surefooted. Suspension not as plush as 4RT. Didn't get a chance to ride hillclimbs so can't comment there. Had to fight it riding up running rocky creek section (round slippery rocks 3" to 8"). Just couldn't keep it straight and stay in the section. By comparison the 4RT was on rails and I cleaned it every time. Handlebar angle or suspension tuning may help (I hope). I was shocked by the difference here. 4RT feels smaller and more nimble between your legs, with less vibration and fuss (not only my opinion). I see marketing of the 2007 SY250F is already out and touting various improvements, so lets hope the gap closes a bit next year. We need more 4T bikes in trials. The 4RT has been the benchmark, and it still is. Cheers, Jim
-
I like the 4RT's because they don't stink...or blow smoke. I'd be worried about any unnecessary additive glazing the bore and causing power loss (two stroke or four stroke).
-
When the Rev-50 is in gear, with the clutch pulled in, the kickstart will not engage. Does anybody know what needs to be done to remove this restriction? My son now finds it very annoying having to always select neutral in order to start the bike. He can at times kick it over with the clutch out and then quickly pull the clutch in as it starts, but this is not always convenient according to the predicament. At the moment we have removed the clutch-side sidecover off the engine, but cannot see anything apparent. On another topic, I saw reference in the past to a 75cc kit for the Rev-50. Can anyone point me to some info on this? Thanks, Jim
-
Does anyone know what the Iridium equivalent is, and have they tried it ? Cheers, Jim
-
We don't want an MX style guard for reasons given above. We're also talking about a typical 8 year old child that does not always have the reflexes or experience to control a fall. Our riding days are typically hot and humid, and of course we are riding trials, so open vision is essential. MX helmets are very hot at slow speeds and hinder peripheral vision. This is obviously a product opportunity for helmet or accessory manufacturers, because EVERY parent I've talked to about this situation are worried about their children's teeth getting damaged or knocked out. Jim
-
Does anyone know of a face guard that can be attached to an open face helmet? Not one of those plastic bmx/motocross things from yesteryear, but maybe a wire cage style guard like cricket or baseball players wear. I'd really like to protect my son's face and teeth a bit more, whilst still giving him most of the ventilation and vision that open face helmets provide. Thanks, Jim