captainfur Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Hi all, I haven't really ridden for 20 or so years (I used to do heaps of trail bike riding 20+ years ago on my old trail bike, usually more trials (rough) type trail riding rather than enduro (fast) type trail riding) and looking at buying a TY175 or TY250 (or maybe other twin shocker, KT250, RL250 etc) to ride casual trials/comp twinshock trials but would like to also to poke around doing some general trail riding exploring etc. My feeling is that the 175 would make a better competitive trials bike but the 250 would be better as a combination trials and trail bike. What about the RL250? What are your thoughts? If its relevant I'm about 5 foot 7 and 78 kgs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee harris Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 ty 250 is best i reckon, beamish is about the same, 200 fantic is better than both and 240 the bestest----in my opinion lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattylad Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 TY 250 every time. A Beamish 325 Suzuki would also be a good bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feetupfun Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 CaptainFur your question sounds very much like one that shaunb asked on the trials.com.au web forum a few days ago. If you are not shaunb, have a look at http://www.trials.com.au/phpBB3/viewtopic....f=16&t=3453 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainfur Posted February 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Thanks for the replies, no I'm not shaunb but I am in Australia (Victoria), I will have a look at the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony283 Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Cpt Furr, Yamaha produced a specific machine for exactly what you desire! It was the TY250A CAT edition which came with forward footrests, an extended bigger seat and lengthened brake pedal, you could also get a luggage rack as well. Gearing and motor were the standard trials set up. If you can find one of these then all you will need is the short brake pedal for trials use. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainfur Posted February 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Thanks for you assistance so far... How would a Ossa TR77 250 be for this use? How hard is it to get parts? Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony283 Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) All the prime manufacturers of that era 72-80 all made what we would now call "dual sport" bikes, Yamaha had the 250 CAT, Ossa had the Explorer and Bultaco the Alpina so if you want a bike that you can comfortably ride trails on and easily convert to trials for a competition any of those would do and in most cases can be converted to the other use in about 1 hour. If it were my choice I would go for the Yamaha, especially where you are, as parts can still easily be obtained either new or from e-bay. Tony Edited February 19, 2008 by tony283 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swooshdave Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 All the prime manufacturers of that era 72-80 all made what we would now call "dual sport" bikes, Yamaha had the 250 CAT, Ossa had the Explorer and Bultaco the Frontera so if you want a bike that you can comfortably ride trails on and easily convert to trials for a competition any of those would do and in most cases can be converted to the other use in about 1 hour.Tony If he wants to do trails and trials wouldn't the Alpina be a much better choice than the Frontera? I thought the Alpina (especially the early ones) was basically the Sherpa T with a comfier seat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony283 Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 My mistake! now corrected....humbly back to my Yams Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swooshdave Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 My mistake! now corrected....humbly back to my YamsTony You've probably forgot more about Yamahas than I know about Bultacos. Speaking of Yamahas, I think I've mentioned this before but it seems like TY175s are way more prevalent at AHRMA events, at least in the West. Is that just me or does that sound right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony283 Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Dave, May well be. Lighter, not much on the AHRMA circuit that a good 175 can't do, I prefer the 250 but I'm biased. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swooshdave Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Dave, May well be. Lighter, not much on the AHRMA circuit that a good 175 can't do, I prefer the 250 but I'm biased. Tony My theory is that it depends on the size of the rider. My uncle is probably about 160lbs and loves his TY175. My cousin is a wee bit north of 200lbs and is contemplating a 200cc kit for his TY175. I'm moving to a 325cc Bultaco, so I won't mind an extra burrito or two... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Personally, I'd say the cost of the 200 conversion for the TY175 isn't worth it. The difference in performance is barely noticeable, if at all. A couple of my mates had theirs done and there was no worthwhile improvement. As Tony has said, in today's classic/vintage events there isn't really anything a TY175 can't cope with. Even in our national classic championship here in the UK which has some pretty difficult sections, a standard TY175 can cope with most stuff as the sections are technical in terms of difficulty rather than big sections that require big power. They aren't as difficult as the national sections of the era for which a 175 wouldn't have been an ideal choice. Be better off spending what a 200 conversion would cost on chassis/suspension set up. A decent pair of rear shocks, angled like a majesty and good forks. If the chassis/suspension is working well it will be of more benefit than a slight power increase. Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon v8 Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 There is an easy solution - buy both ! They are not alot of money to buy and are unlikely to lose any.Compared to most things we buy today,twinshock trials bikes are a much better bet.(Even if its only in terms of personal enjoyment) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.