Jump to content

Flywheel Holding Tool - Sheared Woodruff


sawtooth
 Share

Recommended Posts

Having just measured a matching male and female morse taper on a CMM, and finding one being 2.858 degrees included and one 2.888 degrees, i'd happily call that the same angle.

A note on the taper: The tapers of the crank hub and flywheel hub are different. They are machined at a slightly different angle from each other (it's known as a ".001" interference fit" or a "Morse Taper") so they stick together, and why you need a puller to get them unstuck. When you lap the parts together, the interference fit is gone (the taper angles are now the same), so the parts are not as secure. As such, I'd add a little more torque valve (if torque setting is given in a range, say 38-42 Ft Lbs, use the higher number at least) and check the torque after a couple of heat cycles (riding sessions) as it will probably back off a little (which happens to new bikes if the flywheel fastener is not checked after a few rides). Sometimes, a little red Loctite ("non-serviceable"

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Having just measured a matching male and female morse taper on a CMM, and finding one being 2.858 degrees included and one 2.888 degrees, i'd happily call that the same angle.

O.K., you win.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One can argue this all day in degrees or inches of measure, but it is actually the slight difference combined with the slight plasticity of the metal that creates the greatest bond under pressure.

If I were to lap fit a set, I would then put in a slight differential , using some method, if not for anything else to insure the contact will indeed break on demand! It should do so, or be permanatly in place!

I have no idea what the torque spec is on the Beta, on the Sherco it is 72 ft/lb the Beta should be similar, but ?

Edited by copemech
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The idea was not to cause argument, it was to find a definative answer so i don't bugger the bike again.

Engineers blue showed that the mating parts were the same angle (on my bike at least) so have lapped the two parts and torqued the nut up to 140NM. The bike now starts and runs fine, thanks for everyones input :thumbup:

Edited by SawTooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
The idea was not to cause argument, it was to find a definative answer so i don't bugger the bike again.

Engineers blue showed that the mating parts were the same angle (on my bike at least) so have lapped the two parts and torqued the nut up to 140NM. The bike now starts and runs fine, thanks for everyones input :thumbup:

I apologize for the flip comment, it was uncalled for and certainly not indicative of what I intended to express. E-mail is a quite "cold" way to communicate and lacks the tone, volume, cadence and inflection of the human voice, as well as lack of facial expression, and a comment meant to be funny came across as crappy. Copey will vouch that I'm much, much more goofy than I am grouchy.

At 140 Nm (about 103+ Ft lbs) and lapped, it should hold well. If it slips again, look at where the crank stub protrudes through the flywheel hub. The end step of the stub is often very close to the washer surface inside the hub and when lapped together, the stub will fit slightly farther down in the hub, sometimes far enough so that the step then contacts the washer. All the torque is then on the washer/stub end area (the stub has bottomed out against the washer) and not on drawing the stub in against the flywheel hub.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Heh heh, You know how much I appreciate your technical prowess Jon but man you really "went to town" on this one. I'm sorry but I can't help but sit here chuckling at frustoconical shape, interpenetrating parts and cointegration. A good engineer can get your head spinning with technical jargon but a great engineer can make it sound dirty at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
Heh heh, You know how much I appreciate your technical prowess Jon but man you really "went to town" on this one. I'm sorry but I can't help but sit here chuckling at frustoconical shape, interpenetrating parts and cointegration. A good engineer can get your head spinning with technical jargon but a great engineer can make it sound dirty at the same time.

Dan,

Obviously, not my personal wording (hence the quotation marks, I try not to be as obtuse) but you know what? I re-read that explanation and I did experience an intense desire to nibble my OWN ear......

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Dan,

Obviously, not my personal wording (hence the quotation marks, I try not to be as obtuse) but you know what? I re-read that explanation and I did experience an intense desire to nibble my OWN ear......

Jon

"In some cases the cointegration results in material transfer across the zone of contact, i.e., cold welds."

And if you get that just right you will never, ever, have to worry about it coming loose again! Beat to your own delight! Deal with the remains!

It's all good! :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
  • 1 month later...

I seem to have the stator problem. Revs to about 2 - 3 K then cuts out until rpm drops back again.

Do the two philips headed screws on flywheel need to be removed first before using puller?(the ones where in a previously posted photo , are used to fix the holding tool in place). And is the nut normal left hand thread.

2002 rev3

Also has anyone known of this problem coming and going at all?

thanks

Julian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
  • Create New...