darrensn Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Hi All, does anybody know why the 2007 beta rev 3 is far cheaper second hand than an 2008 beta rev 3 ? They seem to have a around a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02-apr Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I would guess that, at that age, one year can make a difference to the buyer (are they both Evos?) whereas once over that age the market regards them as just another old bike with condition mattering more than age. I ride a perfectly good 03 which must be regarded as just about worthless by many but is worth a lot to me as it saves me spending Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.