Jump to content

Piston skirt cut-out missing


neo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi Gents,

Just pulled the head off my 06 250 and was just about to fit the new Piston (I got from Chris) but noticed there is a cut-out missing on the side skirt compared to the old one... See the old piston on the right here (ignore the gudgeon pin holding them in the same direction for the photo)...

photo1.jpg

The cut-out in the skirt lines up with the front transfer port (carb side) but I'm also concerned it's for con-rod clearance?... If not, why would Sherco cut the skirt out like that?

Also the old piston is marked 05-11 / 10583 and the new one is marked 09-12 / 18744 .... both are "A" 72.75 ..if that makes any sense to anyone?

I'm trying to get this bike back together today but I know it's very early hours for Chris...hence me putting this question up here.

Best of balance.

Neo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 
 
 
 
 

Up and running.

All she's done is idled so far, for 5 mins, but I can tell she's changed.

She started first kick, without choke and only needed a small amount of choke for about 10 seconds before she'd idle (in the low hundreds RPM) on her own. She's idling perfectly. Only changing in note when the fan clicks in. The exhaust gasses smell differenced too ... much cleaner and no big pops so far. I'll use the throttle two or three times (letting her cool each time) tomorrow then let her carry over some flat grass later in the day.

Do I sound like I'm in love? :wub: .... Well I can't wait to give her a good thrashing later this week!!! :bouncy::lol:

Thanks for your help guys :thumbup:

Best of balance.

Neo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Yeah classic port configuration. Basically you shouldn't feel much or any difference at low RPM. At high RPM the column of mixture in the intake tract never goes to zero velocity so the reeds never close and closing the intake tract with the piston restricts the flow. That's why they use intake extenders, to add a longer column of air to act as a forced induction system. If I remember correctly back in the 70's this was Suzuki's big deal at the time on the RM's with a case/reed induction system where the intake fed the crankcase directly through a reed valve with no other valving. At the time most engines used no reeds and had a piston port intake.

So yeah it'll run out of revs sooner then the cutout piston. Not important and probably safer if you're not an expert.

Edited by Dan Williams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
  • Create New...