b40rt Posted March 22, 2014 Report Share Posted March 22, 2014 Rear suspension must be compromised for hoping against traction ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel dabster Posted March 23, 2014 Report Share Posted March 23, 2014 I got a reigar shock made for my sherco in 2007 it was a transformation as the standard shoch was absolutely crap with the spring tension the only adjustment. set up and a good shoch are underestimated even for us club riders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffsgasgas Posted March 28, 2014 Report Share Posted March 28, 2014 (edited) So when in Germany a few weeks ago I noticed something that is not common here in the states. There were numerous bikes that had custom shocks with external resivoirs mounted right above the flywheel cover. Most were on teens bikes with obvious support. So ignorant question. How many custom shock shops are available there in the EU specific to trials? Here in Detroit we have several MX shock people and auto shock specialty shops but thats pretty rare in comparison to other areas. --Biff PS great topic Edited March 28, 2014 by biffsgasgas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomant Posted March 28, 2014 Report Share Posted March 28, 2014 Watching the slow mo vid I can see that trials bikes would very much benefit from "Active" suspension. Now that would be a cool innovation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel dabster Posted March 29, 2014 Report Share Posted March 29, 2014 i spoke to the ohlins shock guy and he said for anyshock to work on continuous usage it needs a reservoir, thats what he has on all the works bikes, pretty sure fuji had it on his bike when they tore it down at shefield one year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavydabber Posted March 30, 2014 Report Share Posted March 30, 2014 As per Newton's 3rd law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction and with Jotagas' design the reaction is straight though the main beam of the frame whereas other makes are vertical and need an outrigger that needs to be quite substantial to react the forces without flexing. Yup, I'd go with this, the stresses are directed straight up the main frame side-member which is obviously already there, so why not use it for a shock mount?. From an engineering point of view, advantages over a centrally mounted shock are: No need for the weight and complexity of a braced central cross-member to mount the top of the shock to Much improved access to shock and linkage maintenance Allows for a bigger airbox and more direct airflow into carb From a selling point of view it's novel and different Disadvantages Vulnerability to damage Doesn't contribute to centralisation of mass/weight I don't personally think that the design of the actual linkage is a million miles different from the old Yam TY/TYZ arrangement, the short link just runs direct to the bottom shock mount, obviously dimensions will have been worked on and optimised since those days and shock technology and development has moved on light years which is where the massive improvements will be, but principally it works in much the same way. But it's thinking "outside the box" and has moved things on! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telecat Posted March 31, 2014 Report Share Posted March 31, 2014 We have just fitted an Ohlins to the Jotagas. First time out it appears that it handles the energy better than the Olle. The Shock and spring are a little larger than the Olle so you need to move a few spacers around to push the exhaust away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.