Jump to content

Cotswold Cups


wallo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi Guy's,

This same sort of thing that Dave says, Happened at the Manx Classic, last year, and the loop at the start of the section just got wider with every rider, then a Top name took the wee with his interpretation, by going wider still.

The observer had lost his cool by this time, so said rider who should have known better and the riders that followed with his route got five, Dave should remember this as he again was telling riders not to follow that line.

Regards Charlie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Results are out but I didn't get any either. I mistakenly thought they e-mailed them these days but seems it's still done by envelope so if you didn't send one with your entry (like me...) that's probably why you haven't got them.

If you e-mail the secretary Julie, she'll e-mail them back to you, which is what Colin did. I got him to send them onto me. I can send them to you if you want, PM me your email.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Sadly it's now such a common theme, riders taking the pi55, that when i lay out i always go back the next day and re look at the section and think now where would ********** go and i had therefore better put some flags exactly there so he cant. I suppose it's all part of being competitive just like when they build or modify their bike. It has become the norm now in trials to always try to gain the unfair advantage and push the rules to breaking point and beyond. A lot of observers dont want confrontation so let them get away with it even worse when riders observe each other. Many a time i have arrived at a section i have laid out to find flags removed or ignored and the riders just going where they like. It's depressing really.

The other extreme which i have seen support for on here is almost as bad. You know the old "imaginary line between markers" one. Laid out a section the other day and the obvious line was to follow the curve of the path but under the "imaginary line rule" instead of using just four sets of flags to mark the line i should have had to use 40 !!! which would be ridiculous too. All sections cant be treated like a 50p piece either.

As i said earlier we all know when someone modifies a bike and is taking the pi55, a certain chinese pit bike engined monstrosity comes to mind, and we ALL know when a riders line is taking the pi55 also. I always ask the observer first if i can go wherever if it's not obvious and always comply with his interpretation of the Clerk of the Course's laying out.

Should be more than a 5 in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 

If anyone has the results i would appreciate a copy.. Cheers. As for the pit bikes, a letter from John Collins at the ACU is out banning the pit bikes with new rules for the Sammy Miller Championships. !! See below..

Sammy Miller rule changes from the ACU.. Now as below for 215 and so there can be no doubt

For Classes 3 & 6 : Twinshock, Drum Brakes and not eligible for Class 2 or 5 respectively

AND AN ORIGINAL OR REPLICA /SILHOUETTE FRAME OF A MACHIME COMMECIALLY AVAILABLE AND ADVERTISED PRIOR TO 1990.

The twin shock and drum brakes should be easy to determine. The latter is where it gets controversial – perhaps. If it “ looks” like the machine it purports to represent – we can regard it as a replica/ silhouette

If it does not – or just has a bit if it looks like the original – it cannot be deemed to be a replica/ silhouette

Therefore, it must follow a machime not complying with these three things must go into Non Championship class, either on Route A or Rouite B

Enjoyable day out, but no Championship points

John Collins
Chairman ACU T & E

The intention of the amendments made to the classes of the ACU Sammy Miller Trial Championship was an attempt to bring the classes of Twinshock machines, which often had the Replica or Silhouette descriptions, into line with the other British Bike classes which have been in existence for many years. The desire was, and still is, to prevent modern mono machines being converted to Twinshocks and also to confirm that a Replica should be just that i.e a Replica of something previously made and in line with the overall philosophy of the Series. The age of a rider, capacity of any particular machine is not a relevant argument against this attempt.

However it does appear that the introduction of the words “50 machines” has caused concern and therefore for 2015 the criteria for CLASSES 3 & 6 will be:

For machines with twin-shock rear suspension and drum brakes as at the time of manufacture which are not eligible for class 2 and 5. All machines must have original frames or have replica/silhouette frames of machines that were commercially available and advertised prior to 1990.

Additional Non Championship Twin-shock Specials Class: For machines with twin-shock rear suspension and drum brakes which are not eligible for Classes 3 and 6. This class is intended for competitors to enjoy the principle of this Series with specials which are not eligible.
This additional class will be included on both Route A and Route B

PLEASE NOTE: FOR 2016 IT IS INTENDED THAT A COMPLETE REVIEW OF ALL THE CLASSES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN AS THE TRIALS AND ENDURO COMMITTEE REMAIN OF THE VIEW THAT THE ORIGINAL PHILOSOPHY OF THIS SERIES IS BEING LOST AND NEEDS EXAMINATION.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 

not wishing to bang on but does this club actually send out results ,because still none yet in the SAE that was put in with my entry ,(as was last year and they also never came ) .Not being funny but results being issued within a reasonable time scale is not a lot to ask for .However i am always grateful for the efforts put in by the organisers to stage these events ,I just wish the last little bit could be done ! .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hi Turbo, I got the results yesterday in the post, and am currently talking to the organiser as I've offered to help get the scores out in the future. To be honest I believe results show be published on the tinternet within 48 hours of the trial, after all it is 2015. I will try to scan the results in and publish them tomorrow on this post, so long as the wife hasn't already filed them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
  • Create New...